<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: non-fictions: Rhyme &amp; Reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/</link>
	<description>for your imagination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russell B. Farr</title>
		<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell B. Farr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ticonderogaonline.com/ticon4/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I agree that I should have prefaced this, pointing out the date and delay in publishing this article.

What I believe Jennifer has done in this article is take a look at book publishers around at the time, not magazine publishers (a closer read shows that there&#039;s only one paragraph glossing over magazines).

What I think this paper represents is an objective look from someone outside the genre, free from any vested interests. And this is something I&#039;m happy to encourage.

I&#039;d encourage anyone interested to spend the time writing the articles they&#039;d like to see, and submit these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that I should have prefaced this, pointing out the date and delay in publishing this article.</p>
<p>What I believe Jennifer has done in this article is take a look at book publishers around at the time, not magazine publishers (a closer read shows that there&#8217;s only one paragraph glossing over magazines).</p>
<p>What I think this paper represents is an objective look from someone outside the genre, free from any vested interests. And this is something I&#8217;m happy to encourage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d encourage anyone interested to spend the time writing the articles they&#8217;d like to see, and submit these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TansyRR</title>
		<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>TansyRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ticonderogaonline.com/ticon4/?p=57#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also surprised to see such an out of date article presented as a state of the current small press scene - perhaps an introduction early on which makes the time period it is covering clear would be less confusing to readers?  Especially with terms like &#039;last year&#039; used - it would be good to know the writer is referring to 2005, not 2007 before you get to the footnotes at the end.

I certainly found the case studies interesting - a look at the personalities behind the publishers and the argument about what exactly constitutes niche/small press publishing.

ASIM was an odd omission, though, as it had already been publishing steadily for 5 years at the time the article was written, one of the post-Worldcon boom of publishing, and as Tehani mentioned, one which utilised different and experimental types of publishing to find its audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also surprised to see such an out of date article presented as a state of the current small press scene &#8211; perhaps an introduction early on which makes the time period it is covering clear would be less confusing to readers?  Especially with terms like &#8216;last year&#8217; used &#8211; it would be good to know the writer is referring to 2005, not 2007 before you get to the footnotes at the end.</p>
<p>I certainly found the case studies interesting &#8211; a look at the personalities behind the publishers and the argument about what exactly constitutes niche/small press publishing.</p>
<p>ASIM was an odd omission, though, as it had already been publishing steadily for 5 years at the time the article was written, one of the post-Worldcon boom of publishing, and as Tehani mentioned, one which utilised different and experimental types of publishing to find its audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz G</title>
		<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ticonderogaonline.com/ticon4/?p=57#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Tehani, want to list a few links to the newer publishers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tehani, want to list a few links to the newer publishers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell B. Farr</title>
		<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell B. Farr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ticonderogaonline.com/ticon4/?p=57#comment-9</guid>
		<description>The delay is entirely my fault, as the article was originally written in 2006 and has had to wait until I got my health together to see the light of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The delay is entirely my fault, as the article was originally written in 2006 and has had to wait until I got my health together to see the light of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tehani</title>
		<link>http://ticon4.com/2008/12/non-fictions-rhyme-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Tehani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ticonderogaonline.com/ticon4/?p=57#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Interesting article but disappointing to see some of the newer Aussie publishers not mentioned, some of which are embracing a blend of print and electronic output in an attempt to be financially viable at home and overseas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article but disappointing to see some of the newer Aussie publishers not mentioned, some of which are embracing a blend of print and electronic output in an attempt to be financially viable at home and overseas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
